By Hugo Novales

Out of the 38 jurisdictions around the world that have legalised same-sex marriage, only 2 in Asia have done so. Taiwan was first to grant gay couples the same legal rights as heterosexual couples back in 2019, and Thailand followed suit this past January.

In Hong Kong, the Court of Final Appeal issued a 2023 verdict that gave the government a two-year deadline to create the legal framework necessary to recognise same-sex marriage. However, the proposed Same-Sex Partnerships Bill, which would have given gay couples rights regarding medical decisions and end-of-life care, was voted down 14-71 in early September.

With this news fresh in mind, the FCC held an October Club Lunch panel featuring Jerome Yau, Co-Founder of Hong Kong Marriage Equality (HKME), as well as three Consuls General from countries that have legalised same-sex marriage: Jennifer Bourke from Ireland, Chaturont Chaiyakam from Thailand, and Pablo Macedo from Mexico.

Hosting the panel was FCC President Morgan Davis, who asked the three Consuls General to describe their respective countries’ processes for legalising same-sex marriage.

Ireland was the first to legalise same-sex marriage via popular vote in 2015. In the ten years since then, Bourke observed that despite her country’s historical ties to the Catholic Church, same-sex marriage hasn’t resulted in any negative impacts to Irish society as previously claimed by religious conservative groups.

“The sky didn’t fall. Nothing bad happened. Everything just kind of continued as normal, but it was better for the LGBTQ community,” she said.

Also navigating LGBTQ issues in a historically conservative society is Mexico, the first Latin American country to legalise same-sex marriage. Starting with Mexico City in 2009, same-sex marriage was then a federal issue, meaning that all 31 states in Mexico needed to pass their own local laws to allow gay couples to get married. The final state to enact same-sex legislation did so in 2022, and Mexico then made marriage equality a constitutional right in February 2023.

Macedo commented on the seemingly contradictory nature of protecting LGBTQ rights in such a devoutly religious society.

“Mexico is the only country in the world with an X in its name, and X also goes in oxymoron. It is a contradiction. Mexico is a contradiction in many, many things,” he said, adding that, “I don’t see any dissent now, even in very staunch conservative groups. People are getting used to it.”

In the case of Thailand, Chaiyakam explained that while the “land of smiles” may appear to be the most LGBTQ-friendly country in Asia, even with its “Pink Plus economy” aimed to attract tourists from around the world, conservatism is still a core value among Thai people.

“From outside, I think you may think Thailand is a liberal country, but deep down, if you are in Thailand, we are a very conservative country. But we have embraced diversity,” he said.

Thailand’s growing acceptance of the LGBTQ community and the increasing number of couples of all sexual orientations not having children helped pave the way for the Marriage Equality Act to be passed in October 2024 and put into effect this January.

While conservative groups still exist in Ireland, Mexico, and Thailand — with some groups still voicing their strong opposition to the LGBTQ community — the three Consuls General agreed that it would be unlikely that any of their country’s marriage equality legislation could be reversed easily.

Hong Kong hasn’t been able to pass its own legislation. Still, HKME is committed to educating citizens about LGBTQ issues.

“Our campaign is to win hearts and minds. In any society, you have people who are supportive of our cause, people who are against our cause, but at the same time we have the ‘moveable middle’, which is the group of people [who] we want to win support [from],” Yau said.

He then explained that despite a 2023 survey in which 60% of respondents said that they supported same-sex marriage, Hong Kong is also home to a strong, conservative block who are primarily Christian. There are more Buddhists and Taoists living in the city, yet Yau highlighted how this group has a massive amount of support and influence — resulting in the bill’s 14-71 loss in the Legislative Council.

While some may view this as an end to Hong Kong’s efforts to enact marriage equality, Yau and HKME haven’t lost hope for a more inclusive future.

“It’s a matter of time,” he said.

To watch the full discussion, please visit the FCC’s YouTube channel:

By Hugo Novales

As Formula One inches closer toward the end of its longest-ever season, former racecar driver and motorsport expert Matthew Marsh returned to the FCC to share his latest insights with a crowd of the Club’s most dedicated F1 fans.

With Second Vice President Tim Huxley moderating the discussion, Marsh first talked about McLaren’s management issues and how they impact the team’s top drivers, Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri.

“The road to hell is paved with good intentions,” Marsh said when reflecting on the McLaren drama in a follow-up interview after his FCC talk.

Drama — nothing new for F1 — dates back to the 2024 Hungarian Grand Prix where Norris initially declined orders to allow Piastri to overtake him for first place. Piastri was in danger of being passed by Ferrari’s Lewis Hamilton, and with just two laps remaining, Norris changed his mind, allowing Piastri to secure his first-ever F1 victory while Norris and Hamilton placed in second and third, respectively.

Since then, McLaren has experienced a variety of position swap decision disputes that threaten both the team’s stability and ranking against other F1 teams.

Marsh compared McLaren’s internal trouble with that of Red Bull, who in July sacked team principal Christian Horner 17 months after being accused of inappropriate conduct, accusations that he was later cleared of after an internal investigation. The team made several other staff changes, and unlike McLaren, continued upgrading and improving their cars.

Red Bull’s Max Verstappen still stands in third place in F1’s overall rankings with 306 points while Piastri holds first with 346 and Norris holds second with 332, yet Marsh believes Red Bull’s continuous push for solid performance and improved engineering could lead to Verstappen becoming this year’s champion.

“[At] F1, we like to support the underdog,” he said. “I think most of us want to see the underdog come through, and Max [Verstappen] is now the underdog, and it’s a great story.”

Marsh went on to praise Verstappen’s performance this season, noting that he “never has a bad weekend” and secures wins consistently and without error.

“If you can win, win it now,” Marsh added, highlighting the competitive and ever-changing nature of F1.

The 2025 season has seen only three F1 races in East Asia: Round 2 in China, Round 3 in Japan, and Round 18 in Singapore. Plans for an F1 track in Vietnam have been scrapped, which could impact Thailand’s ambitions for a 2028 race. If Thailand eventually pulls out, Marsh finds that this move would be Thailand “shooting itself in the foot” out of cost and logistics concerns.

“We do need an extra race in Asia,” Marsh said.

If not Thailand, then who? Seoul in South Korea, as well as the FCC’s very home of Hong Kong are the only two potential candidates that make sense to Marsh, yet getting to this particular finish line will be just as much work (if not more) than competing in an actual F1 race. Both a visionary project leader and buy-in from government officials are key to bringing any city’s ambitions to host F1 to life.

Despite the common pushbacks to hosting an F1 race, Marsh’s stance is that the hard work in building a new F1 destination in Asia will benefit tenfold for both the local economy and national pride. He cited his experience living in Singapore where a single F1 event encapsulates the city.

“To have your city on the stage to show that you can host a Grand Prix… How proud do you feel about the fact that your nation puts on one of these — only 24 in the world — and executes it?” Marsh asked rhetorically.

Marsh also shared his views on the accuracy of F1: The Movie (2025), Ferrari’s performance in comparison to other leading F1 teams, Apple’s impact on F1, and more.

To watch the full discussion, please visit the FCC’s YouTube channel:

By Hugo Novales

The Vietnam War ended on April 30, 1975, just over 50 years ago. Spanning nearly two decades and resulting in a total loss of over a million lives, it was one of the longest and deadliest conflicts that shaped history and still echoes today.

The Vietnam War also made an impact on the FCC and the journalism industry as a whole. 

During the war, the FCC became a hotspot for journalists covering the conflict, as did Saigon, the former capital of South Vietnam where correspondents were free to live and work — much unlike the arrangements for journalists in World Wars I and II. Many of the war’s iconic photographs, including the last helicopter out of Saigon, were even taken by FCC members.

The FCC’s Bunker, a quiet room located next to the Main Bar and Lounge, is dedicated to the Vietnam War and all the correspondents who risked their lives to cover it. Photographs, memorial plaques, and even some of the original cameras that these journalists used are all on display.

Earlier this year, the FCC hosted a Club Lunch to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the end of the war with a panel of correspondents and other notable FCC members who witnessed the conflict firsthand.

Moderating the discussion was Correspondent Governor Jennifer Jett, who asked Edie Lederer, the first panelist, about this year’s Reunification Day celebrations which she attended at the invitation of the Vietnamese government.

“[It was] very, very joyous,” she said.

Lederer was the first woman to cover the Vietnam War full time for the Associated Press and later became the AP’s first female bureau chief overseas, in Lima, Peru. She also lived and worked in Hong Kong. She has been the AP’s chief correspondent at the United Nations for the past 25 years, and her reporting career has taken her to every continent except Antarctica.

Previous celebrations (which Lederer also attended) didn’t have as many young people show up when compared to this year’s event. The Covid-19 pandemic canceled the 45^th Reunification Day parade that would have taken place in 2020, which ultimately led to a massive and highly anticipated parade this year — the first in 10 years.

Lederer, along with other correspondents from the Vietnam era, was able to reminisce about her days as a war correspondent during the occasion. She shared what it was like for her and others to relive some of the most dangerous days of their lives.

“[It’s a] terrific, emotional, cathartic experience for a lot of them as it was for me,” she said.

Annie van Es, the second panelist, was not a journalist herself but was able to witness her late husband Hubert “Hugh” van Es and his fellow correspondents relive their “shared danger” back when they lived in Saigon from 1969 to 1972.

She described Saigon as a “very livable and fun place” that was actually far away from the battlefield. When Hugh would come back from his reporting trips, the couple would often gather with his fellow war correspondents at bars across Saigon so they could decompress over a few drinks. This is where Annie was able to hear their stories and see how Vietnam correspondents bonded over their “close brushes with death.”

The panel then explored Hugh van Es’s self-assessment of his own work covering the Vietnam War.

Kees Metselaar, a fellow Dutchman and close friend of Hugh van Es, was willed Hugh’s collection of photographs and other journalistic materials after he passed away in 2009. As the third panelist, he shared what Hugh thought of his own work, revealing that while his photo of evacuees lined up on a Saigon rooftop trying to escape via helicopter was one of the most iconic photos from the war’s end, it was merely “accidental.”

Hugh, accompanied by a group of soldiers and other correspondents, noticed that the roof of the building across the street from their office was being reinforced with steel just a couple of days before the evacuation. They kept a close eye on the building and Hugh was able to capture the iconic shot as if it were just another day on the job — nothing more, nothing less.

Metselaar said Hugh was more proud of his work covering the Battle of Hamburger Hill, a controversial battle that resulted in the loss of many American lives despite holding little strategic value in the conflict.

Hugh’s photos, along with the coverage from various other news organizations, spurred widespread U.S. criticism of the battle as well as the overall U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, which continued to be mired in controversy until its chaotic end in 1975.

To watch the full discussion, please visit the FCC’s YouTube channel:

By Brett Free

If ever a man was in his element – in his “zone” – it was Kerry McGlynn at the Main Bar of the FCC during the Friday Night Swill.

This is not what defined “Maestro McGlynn” as a person – far from it. But this is where Kerry brought to bear, on a regular basis, all the elements that made him such a “Master of the Dark Arts” where government PR, off-record chats, and background briefings “between us girls” met the hard-nosed, cynical coalface of Hong Kong’s local and international press corps.

Kerry often quipped that he worked for the Ministry of Truth. This always elicited loud guffaws, as well as a nod and a wink from those who got the joke. This was Kerry’s clever way of disarming those he met – a self-deprecating nod to the fine line that ex-hacks like himself had to walk to fulfil the role of a “government spokesman” while engaging the media in a meaningful way.

And it worked. After all, someone who took the mickey out of himself wasn’t your bog-standard government spinmeister – he was more like “one of us”, an ex-journo who understood the media and knew he had to earn their trust and respect. And that he did in large measure.

Kerry’s Friday night forays epitomised his reputation as a bloke that everyone seemed to know or wanted to meet and was genuinely happy to see.

Within seconds of entering the Club, Kerry was talking to someone. Sometimes in the foyer, or on the steps leading to the bar. The Snug was a fertile ground for engagement – though for just a “quiet” word or two. In the Main Bar – left, right and centre – Kerry had spotted someone, or someone had spotted Kerry, and there ensued a quick chat, a bit of banter, a “call me” or “talk to you later” and plenty of laughs. Everyone loved Kerry’s laugh, it was contagious.  

For those waiting for him at the bar, Kerry’s arrival was always noticed but the big question was: When would he finally arrive? It was often 15 or 20 minutes before “K”, “K-ster” or  “Kerrance” as he was known to different friends, had run the gauntlet of correspondents, contacts, confidantes and acquaintances before plonking down his card, opening a tab, and starting a session with a cleansing Prosecco before settling down to his regular Pinot Grigio (Members pour). And then, holding court for the rest of the night.

Front desk staff always greeted “Mr McGlynn” with a smile and a warm welcome, as did staff all over the Club and his regular haunts such as the Hong Kong Cricket Club. Kerry didn’t just say hello – he knew most staff by name, asked how they were, what they were doing, and how their families were going.

This genuine warmth and interest in people was a trait that endeared Kerry to all he met – from the small potatoes to the “grown ups” he advised in government and, later, business circles.

His silky-smooth voice would put people at ease, whether a young colleague needing calm reassurance, or a loh baan or taipan seeking advice on a thorny communications conundrum.  

To those who worked with him, Kerry was indeed the “guru”, the Prince of PR, the King of Cool and the Sultan of Suave to boot. He was approachable, inquisitive, widely read, and possessed a razor-sharp news sense. He was humble, kind, empathetic, accommodating and fair – he looked out for the little guys and gals – but also a tough task master when it came to the standards required to perform at a high level in the PR world. Rarely critical or negative, Kerry led by example, set the bar high and then did what he could to lift his team.  

He always provided honest, unvarnished advice, even if those he was briefing didn’t want to hear it. When Kerry spoke, people listened – not because they had to, but because they wanted to hear what he had to say.

Kerry’s work ethic, sense of a“fair go” and strong desire to chart his own course were shaped by his upbringing in a large, working-class Irish Catholic family in Sydney’s tough inner west. He dropped out of school aged 15 and eventually scored a job as a copy boy on the Daily Mirror. He landed a prized cadetship on his 17th birthday in 1958.

Kerry cut his teeth in the highly competitive Sydney media scene at a time when journos worked hard and played even harder. In his heart, he was always a newspaper man.    

In 1963, aged just 22, he upped stumps and headed to the U.K. to work on Fleet Street for Australian Consolidated Press. It was in the U.K. that he met the love of his life, Jenny. Realising that she was “the one”, they married in Bournemouth in 1965. They returned to Sydney in 1968, where Kerry worked for Sydney’s The Daily Telegraph and Sunday Telegraph.

He joined the Government Information Services (GIS) as a direct recruit Senior Information Officer in 1974. After just six years, he was posted to the London Office in 1980 for a two-and-a-half-year stint to help raise Hong Kong’s profile ahead of the Handover negotiations. This was the prime overseas posting in those days because of the link it played between Whitehall and the Hong Kong Government.  

At the end of 1982 Kerry returned to Hong Kong to work in the-then Public Relations Division responsible for monitoring local and international news coverage on Hong Kong and providing a pithy summary of key issues and coverage to government leaders at “morning prayers” every day at 8:00 am.

Within a decade of starting at GIS, Kerry was promoted to Assistant Director in February 1984 – a stellar rise considering the norm in those days was at least five years in each rank of Senior, Principal and Chief Information Officer before being considered for testing as a Directorate Officer. As ever, Kerry was ahead of the game.

Kerry defied the norms again in 1987 when appointed head of the Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office in New York (NYETO). These overseas postings were and still are jealously guarded by the Administrative Officer (AO) grade, so Kerry’s highly unusual posting did not go unnoticed. He seized the opportunity and challenge to represent the “New York of the East” in the Big Apple itself. His proactive approach and engagement of media, political and business contacts in New York and beyond – coupled with his natural charm and love of Hong Kong – was a benchmark for such postings.

The last Governor’s arrival in July 1992 heralded a seismic shift in the way the UK chose to handle the transition to 1997 – and opened the door for Kerry to assume a role that would coalesce all he had learned in 37 years of journalism and government PR.

Kerry’s  appointment as Chris Patten’s Press Secretary in 1993 gave full play to his potential and knowledge as a trusted and vital member of the Governor’s “inner circle” of political aides and advisers, the likes of which Hong Kong had never seen. Kerry was in his element and thrived – not without its stresses and strains. But this is where he was always meant to be and wanted to be, in the thick of the action.

Patten’s modus operandi as a seasoned politician ensured that Kerry, his main connection to the media, was in the loop on all matters big and small. This trust and access enabled Kerry to speak with authority to local and foreign press – and contribute strategically in meetings with the government’s top echelon. Kerry remained close friends with Patten and wife Lavender after 1997, and rumour has it that Patten even adopted Kerry’s signature fashion quirk of wearing non-matching socks.     

After Patten’s departure, Kerry returned to the Information Services Department as DDO – Deputy Director (Overseas) – responsible for Hong Kong’s international media, promotion, marketing and engagement with international stakeholders such as chambers of commerce, the HKTDC and the HKTB.

It is a mark of his foresight that while still at Government House – with all that was going on in the run up to 1 July, 1997 – Kerry turned his mind to how Hong Kong might be positioned and promoted after the reversion of sovereignty. This was the genesis of BrandHK, but the Asian financial crisis in 1998 put it on the back burner for a few years. “Asia’s World City” was eventually launched with considerable fanfare in May 2001.

Kerry also commissioned workshops at the HKCEC for hundreds of senior officials to help them understand the thinking behind BrandHK, and reinforce the notion that everyone had a role to play in Hong Kong’s positioning as Asia’s World City. Again, another first.  

Post-97 Kerry’s talent and skills as a storyteller and speech writer were put to good use by Anson Chan and Donald Tsang, the two most senior officials embodying the continuity and stability that Hong Kong needed on the international stage at the time. As the key transition leaders for the HKSAR, both Anson and Donald knew well how Kerry operated, and sought his input and counsel.

“Kerry has done sterling service to Hong Kong during his time with ISD and afterwards,” former Chief Executive Donald Tsang told The Correspondent, the FCC magazine. “I always treasured his wise counsel and will never forget his unwavering support when we travelled overseas together to promote and fend for Hong Kong.”

Kerry retired from ISD in January 2002, returning to Sydney with wife Jenny to reunite with his daughters Kate and Lucy and their families. Sadly, Jenny was bravely battling cancer at the time and passed away in October 2004 – leaving a massive hole in the lives and hearts of Kerry and his daughters.

Kerry wholeheartedly supported Jenny’s work to establish the Life Education Activity Programme (LEAP) in Hong Kong, which since its launch in 1994 has provided healthy living education to more than two million school children. In honour of his wife, and to continue contributing to Hong Kong, Kerry continued serving on the LEAP board and was even sending out fundraising appeals the day before he died.

After Jenny’s passing, Kerry returned to Hong Kong to provide strategic communications advice to the government in the run up to and staging of the World Trade Organization’s Ministerial Conference in December 2005.

He was then snapped up by Cathay Pacific as a special adviser to the CEO, after which he became a special adviser to the CEO of Swire Properties. CLP also made good use of his PR talent and writing skills. It was during this time that he courted the second love of his life, “LV”, whose infectious laugh and caring nature endeared her to all of K’s friends.   

Kerry drew a line under his time in Hong Kong in October 2016 – 42 years after first setting foot in the city. Back in Sydney, he spent plenty of time with his family, grandchildren and friends, and set up home in the inner-west suburb of Balmain. He remained remarkably well informed on Hong Kong affairs.  

Kerry was not without some health challenges, but he did not share this news widely. He just preferred to “get on with it”. He battled and beat lung cancer, losing a third of a lung in the process. This impaired his lung function, which was a contributing factor in his diagnosis a few years ago with incurable pulmonary hypertension.

Kerry bravely fought this scourge for as long as he could but succumbed on 11 September, 2025 with his daughters and LV by his side. True to form as an ex-hack with a penchant for explaining the who, what, where, when and why, Kerry prepared his own death notice to be posted on Facebook. He chose a photo which is quintessential Kerry – quietly confident, impeccably dressed and with just a twinkle of mischief in his eyes. This announcement came as a huge shock to most of his friends who had no idea that he had been so ill.

“Not the way I intended to go but, as they say, life’s a bitch and then you die. I love you all.”

We love you too, mate.

Brett Free retired as ISD Deputy Director in early 2022. Kerry McGlynn chaired the selection panel that hired him in 1993.

By Hugo Novales

Newsrooms across the globe are facing increasing ethical challenges in their daily work.

AI-generated content, political pressure and bias, the dangers of reporting in conflict zones, internet and visa restrictions — all of these (and more) are just a few examples of the hurdles the average journalist must overcome in pursuit of fair and accurate reporting.

With all these challenges, how can a journalist maintain their professional integrity?

To answer this question, FCC Correspondent Governor Jennifer Jett hosted a fully-booked Club Lunch with two ethics experts: Selina Cheng, Chairperson of the Hong Kong Journalists Association (HKJA), and Eric Wishart, the Standards and Ethics Editor at AFP and author of the new book Journalism Ethics: 21 Essentials from Wars to Artificial Intelligence (2024).

The first topic the panel discussed was the idea of “good Hong Kong stories.”

John Lee, Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, has been promoting this idea of “good Hong Kong stories” as far back as July 2022. He included this concept in his Policy Address in October of the same year.

“Good Hong Kong stories” has been met with confusion and skepticism among Hong Kong newsrooms — most notably Hong Kong Free Press, which summarized its failed efforts to engage with the local government in a January 2024 feature story.

“One thing I hear is that journalists are supposed to tell good stories about Hong Kong. That’s not our job. We’re not propagandists. We should neither tell good nor bad. We should just tell what’s happening,” said Wishart, a former FCC President.

Cheng also said concepts like “good Hong Kong stories” and other top-down initiatives may conflict with the objective of journalism, especially the work of investigative journalists and other reporters working with sensitive information.

“Are you supposed to be a watchdog and speak for those who are voiceless, bring to the surface things that society didn’t know, or are you supposed to channel and agenda, promote values that are allowed?” she said.

Cheng was also asked about censorship and self-censorship in Hong Kong, and in particular how journalists should proceed with their daily work when the lines between what can and cannot be reported aren’t so clear.

First, Cheng explained the differences between censorship and self-censorship. She defined censorship as a situation where a news story doesn’t get published or is deleted after it’s published, while self-censorship is a choice by the individual journalist as to whether they should write about a specific topic out of concern for their job security or personal safety.

“If you want to live longer, you’ve got to play it safe,” she said, highlighting how self-censorship has become more common not just in Hong Kong, but in other regions across the world including the United States.

Cheng also gave broader advice to journalists and newsrooms who wish to maintain their audience amidst an ever-evolving social media landscape that sees not only newsrooms, but social media influencers, independent news companies, government-run media organizations, and other online entities all competing for attention from daily internet users.

The solution: maintain consistency with the quality of your work — and most importantly, your ethics code — in order to continuously deliver a product that your followers need.

“We already know that people are not just consuming information from news, they’re consuming from a whole host of other channels. If you’re not being relevant to your news readers, your consumers, they’re not going to like you anymore,” she advised.

The panel also discussed the proper methods for reporting on mental health and suicide, how to maintain objectivity despite having personal opinions, false balance, and other journalism-related topics.

To watch the full discussion, please visit the FCC’s YouTube channel: